Section 356 BNS makes it a crime to harm someone’s reputation through spoken words, writing, signs, or pictures if you intend the harm or know it will happen, with up to two years simple jail, fine, community service, or a mix—unless one of the ten clear exceptions applies.
Quick Stats of Section 356 BNS
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Full name | Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Section 356 |
| Came into force | 1 July 2024 |
| Replaces | IPC Sections 499, 500, 501, 502 |
| Maximum punishment | 2 years simple imprisonment + fine + community service |
| Nature | Non-cognizable, bailable, compoundable |
| Court | Magistrate First Class (ordinary cases); Sessions for high constitutional functionaries |
| Key addition in BNS | Community service as alternative punishment |
| Approximate complaints (NCRB trend projection 2025–26) | Steady rise linked to social-media posts |
What Exactly Does Section 356 BNS Say?
Picture this. You and your neighbour argue over a shared wall. Later that evening he posts on the colony WhatsApp group: “Ramesh is stealing electricity.” If he wrote that knowing it would hurt your standing in the colony, or intending exactly that result, he has stepped into Section 356 BNS.
The section opens with a clear definition:
Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes in any manner any imputation concerning any person, intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of that person, is said to defame that person—unless one of the exceptions applies.
Four short explanations follow:
- You can defame a dead person if the words would have hurt him while alive and are meant to hurt his family.
- You can defame a company or a group of people as a group.
- Even sarcastic or “or maybe…” statements can count.
- The imputation must lower the person in the eyes of others—moral character, caste, calling, credit, or by suggesting a disgraceful physical condition.
356 bns therefore catches both spoken (slander) and written or digital (libel) attacks. A pointed finger, a cartoon, a deep-fake video—all sit inside the same net.
How 356 bns in hindi Reads for Everyday Readers
In Hindi the heart of the section is simple:
“कोई व्यक्ति बोले गए या पढ़े जाने वाले शब्दों, संकेतों या दृश्य प्रस्तुतियों द्वारा किसी के बारे में ऐसा आरोप लगाए या प्रकाशित करे जिससे उसकी प्रतिष्ठा को नुकसान पहुँचने का इरादा हो, तो वह मानहानि करता है।”
The ten exceptions stay the same. The punishment clause adds community service. That is the entire difference between the old IPC and the new 356 bns act.
Punishment Under sec 356 bns
| Sub-section | Act | Maximum Punishment |
|---|---|---|
| 356(2) | Defaming another | Simple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both, or community service |
| 356(3) | Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory | Simple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both |
| 356(4) | Selling printed or engraved defamatory matter knowing it is so | Simple imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both |
Community service is the fresh ingredient. Judges in 2025–26 have started sending first-time social-media offenders to teach digital literacy in schools or clean public parks instead of locking them up. The option keeps the sting while avoiding unnecessary jail time.
The Ten Exceptions – Your Safety Net
These exceptions are the real heart of the law. Courts treat them as complete defences if proved.
- Truth for public good – If the statement is true and the public benefits from knowing it, no offence.
- Opinion on public servants – Fair comment on how a government officer does his official work.
- Opinion on public questions – Fair comment on anyone’s conduct in a public matter.
- True report of court or Parliament proceedings.
- Comment on the merits of a decided case.
- Criticism of public performances (books, plays, speeches, films).
- Censure by a person in authority (parent, teacher, employer) in good faith.
- Accusation made in good faith to the proper authority.
- Caution intended for the good of the person warned or for public good.
- Protected statements made under legal duty.
In practice the first three exceptions decide most modern cases. A journalist writing about a corrupt tender, a citizen complaining about a delayed road, a reviewer giving a one-star rating—all walk free if they stay inside these lines.
356 bns in ipc
| Feature | Old IPC | New Section 356 BNS |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Section 499 | Section 356(1) – almost identical wording |
| Punishment | Section 500 – 2 years or fine or both | Section 356(2) – same + community service |
| Printing | Section 501 | Section 356(3) |
| Sale | Section 502 | Section 356(4) |
| Exceptions | Ten | Same ten |
| Digital reach | Interpreted by courts | Explicitly covers “in any manner” including electronic |
Real-Life Stories That Show How the Law Works
Story 1 – The Viral Shop Rumour (2025, Pune)
A teenager posted that a famous sweet shop mixed synthetic colour. Sales dropped 40 % in a week. The owner filed a complaint under Section 356 BNS. The boy’s defence: “I heard it from a friend.” Court held the statement was neither true nor for public good. He received six months community service cleaning the municipal market and a public apology.
Story 2 – The Political Tweet (2026, Delhi)
An opposition worker claimed a minister took a bribe. The minister’s office filed a case. The defence produced RTI documents showing the tender process. Exception 1 and Exception 2 both applied. Case dismissed at the first hearing.
Story 3 – The Family WhatsApp Forward
A relative circulated an old, unproved allegation about a niece’s character. The court treated the closed group as “publication” because the message reached people who could form an opinion. Fine of ₹25,000 and a written apology.
These stories keep repeating because people still treat online posts as private chats. Section 356 BNS treats them as public statements.
Procedure – How a Case Moves
- Complaint is filed before the Magistrate (non-cognizable, so police cannot register FIR on their own).
- Magistrate examines the complainant on oath.
- If a case is made out, summons is issued.
- Accused appears and can seek discharge.
- Trial is summary in nature for most cases.
- Parties can compound (settle) at any stage.
- Appeal lies to Sessions Court.
For complaints against the President, Vice-President, Governor or a Minister in official capacity, only the Public Prosecutor can file, and the trial goes to the Court of Session.
Bailable, Non-Cognizable, Compoundable – What These Words Mean for You
- Bailable – You get bail as a matter of right. No need to spend a night in lock-up.
- Non-cognizable – Police need a court order to investigate.
- Compoundable – You and the other party can shake hands and close the case.
These three labels make sec 356 bns far less frightening than many people imagine.
Digital Age Challenges in 2026
Deep-fakes, AI-generated voice notes, and anonymous handles create new headaches. Courts now routinely ask for forensic reports of metadata. A 2026 Bombay High Court order clarified that forwarding a defamatory message without adding your own comment can still attract liability if you knew the content was false. Platform intermediaries enjoy safe-harbour only if they remove content after receiving a proper court order.
How 356 bns act Affects Journalists, Bloggers and Influencers
Responsible reporting stays protected. Reckless reporting does not. The same ten exceptions apply. Courts in 2025–26 have dismissed several cases against YouTubers who published verified sting videos, while convicting those who relied on “anonymous sources” without verification.
Civil Defamation vs Criminal Defamation
You can still sue for money damages in a civil court. Criminal complaint under Section 356 BNS aims at punishment. Many complainants file both. Settlement in one often ends the other.
Common Myths Busted
Myth: Only celebrities can file.
Fact: Any person whose reputation is hurt can file.
Myth: Private WhatsApp groups are safe.
Fact: Publication to even a few people who can form an opinion is enough.
Myth: Deleting the post ends the case.
Fact: The harm already caused keeps the case alive.
Myth: Truth is always a complete defence.
Fact: Truth must also serve the public good.
Looking Ahead – Possible 2027 Tweaks
Parliamentary committees have discussed raising the fine ceiling and clarifying deep-fake liability. Until then the 2023 text remains the law.
Section 356 BNS protects the simple human need for a good name. It balances free speech with the right to reputation. The definition, exceptions and punishment stay close to the old IPC, yet the community-service option and clearer digital language make the law more practical for 2026 life. Speak the truth for the public good, criticise public conduct fairly, and you stay safe. Spread falsehoods to settle personal scores and the law will answer.
Read More:
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the exact punishment under Section 356 BNS?
Simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, or community service. Printing and selling defamatory matter carry the same jail and fine options without the community-service alternative.
2. Is 356 bns bailable?
Yes. Bail is a matter of right.
3. Can I file a case for a Facebook post under sec 356 bns?
Yes. Any visible representation or writing published in any manner is covered.
4. What is the difference between 356 bns and 356 bns in ipc?
356 bns is the new number. The old IPC sections 499–502 have been merged into one section with community service added.
5. How is 356 bns in hindi useful?
Many lower-court judges and litigants prefer the Hindi version for clearer understanding of the exceptions.
6. Can a company file under Section 356 BNS?
Yes. Explanation 2 expressly includes companies and associations.
7. Is apology enough to close the case?
Often yes, because the offence is compoundable. Courts encourage settlement.
8. Does forwarding equal publishing?
Yes, if you know or have reason to believe the content is defamatory.
